4 ms·
I know it's fashionable to hate on Adam right now, but without him THERE WOULD BE NO COMPANY TO SUE. People tend to forget that.
by dblank9 7y ago
I know it's fashionable to hate on Adam right now, but without him THERE WOULD BE NO COMPANY TO SUE. People tend to forget that.
- pergadad 7y agoBrokej window fallacy! Without him there would be no WeWork but other less broken companies could have received the same capital, created jobs, etc
- dkersten 7y agoGood, then the money could have been put into something where it could be used to create something instead of just enriching some fraud. We don’t need more of these companies, we need good, solid companies that don’t screw people over to enrich some executives.
- MR4D 7y agoThe same is true for Enron, Worldcom, Lehman Brothers, etc. Creating a company and raising billions of dollars so you can defraud people is not about creating a company. It is about gaining money at others’ expense. Do you understand now how your statement is not relevant?
- JumpCrisscross 7y ago> without him THERE WOULD BE NO COMPANY TO SUE And with no company to sue, the plaintiff would have had their cash instead of worthless shares they were induced to purchased by a party with better information than she.