3 ms·
The most pertinent point in that is meant to be 'relative to the size of the community'. There are small communities on reddit that act somewhat like the old-s
by ACow_Adonis 7y ago
The most pertinent point in that is meant to be 'relative to the size of the community'.
There are small communities on reddit that act somewhat like the old-school forums (and presumably a small handful on hacker news, although its a bit harder to happen on-site here due to the lack of the channel mechanism, so if it DOES happen here, its more liable to be because of some connection to a real-world/pre-existing network or a specialised subject-matter selectively clicking on stories and augmenting their communication within the greater online community of HN).
My point is, among the wider HN community, unless your friends fall into the handful of 'celebrity' accounts, those names that you know would likely be anonymous names to most commenters who identify as/are identified as HN posters.
The point is ALSO though, that you're able to do this while maintaining the HN identity, and the HN forum interface, even though relative to HN accounts the accounts of your friends are tangentially approaching 0% of users. And you do this because the news-aggregator mechanisms allow you to self-select into the posts relevant to your interests with very little effort, so you don't FEEL like you're excluding from the community/or being excluded against, even though you're not reading most material and they're not reading yours, and most have no idea who anyone else on the platform actually is.
Scaling like this isn't realistically an option for "Cyberspace security, compiler and UI toolkits forum: your number one place for security, compiler and UI toolkits discussions!".
The last points that i didnt mention was also opportunity cost (in terms of how many networks individuals can actively participate in) and network effects (where do most/key individuals end up spending their time resources). The popularity-based metrics of the news aggregator sites are extremely powerful draws of the majority eyeballs relative to the webforums, and then network effects emit another draw even if there are holdout users who prefer web-forums.
- saagarjha 7y agoNote that very few of the people that I'm talking about are those that I'd call "friends" (and they probably feel the same): they're generally high volume accounts who I have binned based on their views on recurring topics, so I guess they'd be "celebrity" accounts in some sense. Since Hacker News is a small community, this usually gets me a higher recognition rate than you'd otherwise expect; even though I self select by pretty much reading most comment threads about my interests I do glance at a significant fraction of posts that hit the front page even if they're not something I know much about.