>> Because if they can’t that directly invalidates their argument. No, it does not since this is not how logic and science work. You just stay with a claim tha

>> Because if they can’t that directly invalidates their argument. No, it does not since this is not how logic and science work. You just stay with a claim that is missing a support but it does not mean that the claim is false. >> Therefore it’s reasonable to require people making general arguments to provide at least one specific example. Alright. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy and let me know what is the main thing you are uncomfortable with (if any). If there is a match, then I will provide another example.