3 ms·
I remember asking my high school English teacher if I could use the contraction "shouldn't've" for "should not have." She said no. I still disagree.
by vharuck 7y ago
I remember asking my high school English teacher if I could use the contraction "shouldn't've" for "should not have." She said no. I still disagree.
- chapium 7y agoI'd go with should not've for better clarity.
- macintux 7y agoA perfectly valid construction. My science teacher once insisted rivers couldn't flow north because on a globe, north is up. So, yeah, education is a bit of a mixed bag.
- Marsymars 7y ago> My science teacher once insisted rivers couldn't flow north because on a globe, north is up. Did he just not consider, say, the Nile?
- teddyh 7y ago> My science teacher once insisted rivers couldn't flow north because on a globe, north is up. That one seems to be common, oddly enough: http://machall.com/view.php?date=2005-04-06 http://machall.com/view.php?date=2005-04-06 EDIT: After doing some web searches, it seems that this myth, just like robocalls, is also a uniquely U.S. phenomenon, possibly caused by the fact that U.S. geography causes many (possibly most) U.S. rivers to run southwards, even though contrary examples (even within the U.S.) are legion.
- saalweachter 7y agoPrescriptionists gonna prescribe. In vernacular speech, "have" is just contracted left and right; I can actually remember when I realized "'ve" was different from "of", and it wasn't "should of, could of, would of" but "should've, could've, would've". "That better've not been my cupcake you ate." "Do you think you should maybe've put your name on it?"
- dan-robertson 7y agoI quite like y’all’d’ve’d for “you all would have had”, eg “I’m sorry your flight was cancelled, y’all’d’ve’d a great time here”