> Yeah, comparing to downloading a tar file from the website and running ./configure, make etc - right, it's probably quite a similar risk. But who does that?

> Yeah, comparing to downloading a tar file from the website and running ./configure, make etc - right, it's probably quite a similar risk. But who does that? Many linux users? I get most of the software I need through package managers, but somewhat frequently I need to build it by source. Particularly if I want the most up-to-date version on debian. Git cloning a repo is marginally better in the sense that, well, it's open. Theoretically if it were doing something nefarious, someone would've noticed. Is it perfect? No, of course not. I still think it's better than running random curl'd scripts.