2 ms·
In this case I wouldn't worry too much. If you look through those hoax articles, you'll notice that almost all of them barely qualify as stubs (very short) and
by Karunamon 7y ago
In this case I wouldn't worry too much. If you look through those hoax articles, you'll notice that almost all of them barely qualify as stubs (very short) and have few-to-no citations or incoming links. The fact that they survived so long is probably due to the fact Wikipedia is huge and simply nobody noticed them. What good is propaganda if unseen?
- dontbenebby 7y agoYou can look up the traffic to a page: http://stats.grok.se/ http://stats.grok.se/ It'd be interesting to write a crawler to look for "stubbish" articles then checks if they're widely read, then flags a human if so.