I'm sorry. Should have thought about it for a moment. I am annoyed by the way articles are published. If something is simple, why wouldn't someone put it in a

I'm sorry. Should have thought about it for a moment. I am annoyed by the way articles are published. If something is simple, why wouldn't someone put it in a short one liner than providing a detailed explanation? This is not just about this article, I have been following space/tech/economy. Nothing really provides facts. For example: Scientists may have found new variety of black hole - Does it really add to any kind of knowledge / is it a breakthrough. not at all. finding something called black hole, but finding varieties of it, is not. Its just a copied version of someone else's finding and finding some tweaks. Now to tech, - What good is it doing? New tech comes, couple of years later flaws made by the organisation comes out or they get hacked and users details get leaked. Impact is too much and they escape with an apology letter from CEO. Apology email + fined amount is still a good investment for the leaked data. thats how they see. list goes on for every field. Who is the first culprit of all these? the intellectual? Why to race everyone ? What the point ? Doing good isn't. But why money comes into picture in doing good? Why would anyone encourage doing all these? If something seems to be flawed, I'm trying to share my opinion in most polite way but for this one It went off the control. Apologies. Lesson taken. Thank you.