3 ms·
Your arithmetic is not relevant to my point because as I said, when normalized to the same domain, it is valid. > Which, once again, must imply that you have c
by Cybiote 7y ago
Your arithmetic is not relevant to my point because as I said, when normalized to the same domain, it is valid.
> Which, once again, must imply that you have confidence in that evidence.
Nope, think of it as a bayesian update which induces a non-zero but low relative entropy, with respect to the new posterior distribution.
- igouy 7y ago> normalized to just this setting > normalized to the same domain What do you mean by "normalized" ? What "setting" ? What "domain" ? > Nope, think of it as … Think of it as being honest or not being honest.