3 ms·
So what? She said that they released things that they agreed not to discuss in the first place. Why should she have to say what thise things were? Wouldn't that
by injb 7y ago
So what? She said that they released things that they agreed not to discuss in the first place. Why should she have to say what thise things were? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of asking them not to publish those things?
- michaelmrose 7y agoThe premise is that the damage is done its published to untold thousands. That being so it ought to be trivial to actually articulate the actual story if there is one.