3 ms·
> Thus content creators shouldn't have an automatic entitlement to get paid each time someone reads/listens to/watches a work. If those are the conditions for
by briandear 7y ago
> Thus content creators shouldn't have an automatic entitlement to get paid each time someone reads/listens to/watches a work.
If those are the conditions for which the work was created, then they absolutely do. Regardless, downloading a work and distributing it, that’s theft. If the creator/financer made it available, then that’s their prerogative. At some point in the chain, that content left someone’s server under a license agreement that then was broken when the downloader shared it.
The breaking of the license agreement is the issue here. People don’t have a right to break a valid contract unless a court says they do. Regardless if your feelings, it’s still theft.
And yes, we do benefit from copyright. It protects your work from thieves who played no part in the financing or creation of the work.
- tenebrisalietum 7y agoIf a work is truly useful, it's better for more members of a society to have it at a low cost. The other way around benefits one person at the expense of society.
- jmastrangelo 7y agoNot true if the cost is too low to justify creators continuing to invest in such works.
- tenebrisalietum 7y agoCreators should get or have additional sources of funding that don't depend on restricting access.