3 ms·
I don't know how pervasive the act of trying to fit into rules for a Chinese audience is, but the fact that all of cape-movies are made to fit in gave me some t
by seph-reed 7y ago
I don't know how pervasive the act of trying to fit into rules for a Chinese audience is, but the fact that all of cape-movies are made to fit in gave me some tangible reason to say why I find them so empty and lame (and you should to!).
It's also really strange given how much the opposite web content is becoming. With patreon, we're starting to get some seriously fringe content, and the streaming services don't seem to be too afraid of having an opinion either.
- lukifer 7y agoI don't think it's just the "rules" for a Chinese audience (though that doesn't help); I think it's the economics of making movies primarily for a global audience, rather than a particular language, culture, or even sub-culture. This was an "aha" moment in realizing why so many movies over the last decade contain seemingly lazy, blunt dialogue, lacking subtlety or subtext: the meaning needs to come across clearly in subtitles and dubs, divorced from English idioms, cultural context, and intonation.
- catalogia 7y agoIt's quite simple: mass market content is made for the lowest common denominator. See also, Jack of all trades, master of none. It's not a phenomena unique to movies, or the modern international economy, it's a pattern that pops up all over the place. Look at multi-tool pocket knives: capable of doing many things, but mediocre at everything.
- aptwebapps 7y agoAnd as you expand to a global audience, the lowest common denominator gets lower.
- ghemsley 7y agoThat doesn't necessarily follow.
- aptwebapps 7y agoI mean, mathematically it certainly does, but maybe the metaphor is getting a bit strained.
- seph-reed 7y agoYou don't need any fancy word play to express the types of ideas that seem so hollowingly void in these movies.