4 ms·
If the whole argument was based on an experimental result, and that experiment has now been found to be fundamentally flawed and the results of the experiment i
by NickM 7y ago
If the whole argument was based on an experimental result, and that experiment has now been found to be fundamentally flawed and the results of the experiment invalidated, then it seems entirely fine and rational to say that the argument has been debunked.
- buboard 7y agoor, the argument is against the evidence of one experiment. similar protocols using other techniques have provided evidence against the idea that behavioral decisions can be unpredictable.