5 ms·
Maybe I shouldn't have called this repository "bad json parsers". I just added the following to the README: > The name of this repository is intentionally prov
by lovasoa 7y ago
Maybe I shouldn't have called this repository "bad json parsers". I just added the following to the README:
> The name of this repository is intentionally provocative. It's goal is to document limitations of existing json parsers, not to denigrate the work of the many contributors who worked on the various libraries presented here.
- elpocko 7y agoIts*. "It is goal" makes no sense.
- lovasoa 7y agofixed
- bb88 7y agoFirst appreciate the change to the readme. I think that goes a long way. Second, "bad" here is highly subjective. I've never ever hit the recursive depth limit in python with JSON, and if I do, I'll probably think about doing it a different way, in a way that won't require python to do deep recursion.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Igelau 7y agoThe word you're looking for is clickbait ;) "We Ranked The Top JSON Parsers By Call Stack Depth... Number 6 Will Shock You!"