I accidentally clicked get PDF on the recommended paper from the page, this one: "Will EROI be the Primary Determinant of Our Economic Future? The View of the

I accidentally clicked get PDF on the recommended paper from the page, this one: "Will EROI be the Primary Determinant of Our Economic Future? The View of the Natural Scientist versus the Economist" https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2542435117300831?token=4B5FC4C6C7DB8E3F0CDC1C0B2CF12EC90B862D475B6D87FEA2F85F0D2391C377C45D64D27A2E72123E8CADE0F9E1C35D https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2542435117300831?... Which actually answers why the point you bring up is not relevant: "In a recent meeting of scientists and economists in London, economists raised eight points as to why it was not necessary to consider EROI in determining future energy availability or policy." Now the above paper tries to refute those points, but using invalid logic, e.g. arguing that because EROI and costs are linked in oil and gas, then the same observation must hold across categories to renewables.