2 ms·
Time Machine: replaced with CrashPlan Why not use both (as I do)? Local backup is faster; remote backup is ostensibly safer from disaster. Oh, and Time Machine
by sabat 16y ago
Time Machine: replaced with CrashPlan
Why not use both (as I do)? Local backup is faster; remote backup is ostensibly safer from disaster. Oh, and Time Machine is invaluable if you're upgrading your boot drive or are surrendering your Mac to AppleCare.
- loewenskind 16y agoOr you can time machine to a linux machine that does remote backups. That's my strategy.