3 ms·
this is how science works. it is the best model and projection using current data. if you can improve it, please go ahead
by ptah 7y ago
this is how science works. it is the best model and projection using current data. if you can improve it, please go ahead
- superqwert 7y agoYou aren't addressing the arguments at all here. With the error bars that black6 suggests, we cannot possibly infer anything of meaning over long periods of time.
- black6 7y agoI knows how science works. That is why I am asking how we can compare the rate of change when the sample rates being compared are three orders of magnitude off. EDIT: more benefit-of-the-doubt for orders-of-magnitude difference — three instead of six. For example, if we take the yearly average, that’s a sample rate in the micro-hertz. A sample rate of +-80 years is in the nano-hertz range.