The article is just an opinion piece on Bill Gates opinion, it really adds nothing of value, no investigative journalism, no fact checking. I argue that the on

The article is just an opinion piece on Bill Gates opinion, it really adds nothing of value, no investigative journalism, no fact checking. I argue that the only reason people are interested in this article is because of Bill Gates opinion not the ny times. I think search results for the original opinion would be much more relevant than a random persons opinion of the opinion. The opinion of some one else's opinion is not worth money, if ny times considers that as quality journalism I think it says a lot about the quality of their journalism.