4 ms·
>in it you entirely fail to explain how you were wronged by vice The answer clearly stated in Part 1: "I exchanged several emails with Vice magazine making it
by smileypete 7y ago
>in it you entirely fail to explain how you were wronged by vice
The answer clearly stated in Part 1:
"I exchanged several emails with Vice magazine making it clear what the scope of the article would be. The key points being no discussion of sexual orientation or my relationships. This is a very small request as Vice Magazine has interviewed countless male DIY YouTube creators without ever asking them to respond to 4Chan/Reddit allegations about who they sleep with (as they did with me)."
That took me all of... 5 seconds to find?
>You will come off as genuine and sympathetic instead of loathsome.
Yep, that and your earlier post speaks volumes about you...
- michaelmrose 7y agoYou still didn't say what vice is supposed to have released about you and precisely how that effected you. You said you didnt want them to discuss your relationship status or sexual orientation. You didn't actually say what they released about you.
- injb 7y agoSo what? She said that they released things that they agreed not to discuss in the first place. Why should she have to say what thise things were? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of asking them not to publish those things?
- michaelmrose 7y agoThe premise is that the damage is done its published to untold thousands. That being so it ought to be trivial to actually articulate the actual story if there is one.