3 ms·
Usually some kind person posts an Outline link or an Archive link to the full article in the discussions. But I’ve also seen those get buried in the discussions
by newscracker 7y ago
Usually some kind person posts an Outline link or an Archive link to the full article in the discussions. But I’ve also seen those get buried in the discussions about the article. My problem with paywalls is that even if you pay, most of them [1] still thrust trackers (including third party ones) and scripts on you. I find that to be evil. So I refuse to play that game with them and stay away.
To your point, what I’d like to see is a non-paywalled link, whenever shared by someone in the discussions, “pinned to the top” without any votes for it (or assigned a fixed number of votes). Considering that the default interface of HN is all about minuscule fonts that most people won’t even notice, the “web” option is not discoverable by everyone (and seriously, what does “web” even mean when you’re already on the web?). Hence a pinned comment with the same font and size as the rest of the comments, but with an indicator showing it’s pinned.
[1]: As an exception, Ars Technica is the only bigger site I know where a paid subscription means you don’t get any ads or trackers.
- desdiv 7y ago>Usually some kind person posts an Outline link or an Archive link to the full article in the discussions. OP is probably asking because recent changes broke all the common workarounds for some major sites: 1. HN's built-in "web" button (basically a Google redirect) 2. outline.com 3. archive.org Currently all three workarounds are broken for New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, among others.
- NeedMoreTea 7y agoThey seem receptive to an entirely clean incognito browser. If you haven't cleared cookies and history etc or relaunched the usual workarounds fail. There's a few addons that will automate. Turning off JS works for 9 out of 10 paywalls. There's a selection of addons that let you turn on or off JS on a per site basis.