damaging the goal to which they claim to aspire. ... The way to fight for climate change is to recruit an ever larger plurality of humans to voting with their d

damaging the goal to which they claim to aspire. ... The way to fight for climate change is to recruit an ever larger plurality of humans to voting with their dollars and their voices for products and technologies and investments that make the Earth better. I disagree that total number of humans has anything to do with making the right decisions. The key to favorable plurality has always seemed to be education. I also think that the optimal path forward is easier to ascertain / implement when there are less variables in play. It's possible that by sheer luck a person is born with never before seen capabilities - leading to the extreme betterment of society, but if that were a stated goal then it'd be better to protect our ability to iterate into the distant future than to iterate so fast now that we potentially jeopardize our near future.