3 ms·
One side says we don't need change. One side says we do. If you can't convince the other side that voter fraud is rare, then a step that prevents it while at th
by 6gvONxR4sf7o 7y ago
One side says we don't need change. One side says we do. If you can't convince the other side that voter fraud is rare, then a step that prevents it while at the same time not discriminating between voters seems like it might be mutually agreeable.
- mullingitover 7y agoThe side that says we do has repeatedly been found to be making that case in bad faith, with the underlying goal of reducing voter turnout. Do you think it's that important to humor a group whose ultimate goal is mass disenfranchisement?