4 ms·
> These actions may look anti-competitive, but these companies are all foreign. China does anti-competitive stuff to US companies . . . I don't think there's a
by asdfasgasdgasdg 7y ago
> These actions may look anti-competitive, but these companies are all foreign. China does anti-competitive stuff to US companies . . .
I don't think there's any exception in the antitrust laws like "but you can be anti-competitive if the other guy did it first." And anti-competitive behavior in a Chinese company can hardly justify anti-competitiveness against a Japanese company or a Korean company. They may all be in Asia but they are nonetheless different countries. Google is also not a Chinese company, as you are probably aware.
Also a note: you don't have to be a monopoly to be charged with anti-competitive behavior. Being a monopoly can raise the standard of behavior and increase the penalties, but anti-competitive behavior can be illegal on its own, aside from whether you have an actual monopoly. For more you can start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law
- a13n 7y agoI would guess foreign companies aren't protected by US antitrust law the way domestic ones are.