3 ms·
I’m glad to hear that your code is unbreakable and without any bugs, but pcwalton’s claim is still absolutely correct. > This is empirically not true. Tons of
by mcqueenjordan 7y ago
I’m glad to hear that your code is unbreakable and without any bugs, but pcwalton’s claim is still absolutely correct.
> This is empirically not true. Tons of memory safety issues are found (and exploited) all the time in modern idiomatic C++ codebases.
- FpUser 7y ago"I’m glad to hear that your code is unbreakable and without any bugs, but pcwalton’s claim is still absolutely correct" I smell sarcasm here. I do not claim my code to be unbreakable. I do believe it is REASONABLY safe by design. pcwalton's claim is generic claim about generic code that may have no relevance to particular situations. Mine for example