Sorry, maybe I misunderstood OP. I was responding to what I thought was a general, vague question about how something safe might work in Rust, compared to other

Sorry, maybe I misunderstood OP. I was responding to what I thought was a general, vague question about how something safe might work in Rust, compared to other languages (Go in my example). So while I don't think what I said was incorrect re: Go vs Rust concurrency, perhaps I misunderstood OPs question. > Mutexes and locks and all the other ways of doing parallel work that is "safe" isn't a primitive thats cooked in with the language. I didn't understand OPs question as strictly features cooked into the language, so I was not saying that. With that said, if you're not allowing for Mutexes for "safe things that are cooked into the language" I feel like you won't like Rust. This is an odd metric, though. edit: words