3 ms·
> They are still open source because the source is open. That is not the definition of 'Open Source'. Using it interchangeably with 'open source' just adds con
by pritambaral 7y ago
> They are still open source because the source is open.
That is not the definition of 'Open Source'. Using it interchangeably with 'open source' just adds confusion. And from the other uses of 'open source' in your comment, it seems you're using it in the same sense as 'Open Source'
> Not every open source lic is like MIT where you can do whatever you want.
No Open Source license allows you to "do whatever you want". Even the WTFPL, which comes close to that goal, is not an Open Source license. Being Open Source comes with a few requirements, which every Open Source license, licensor, and licensee must fulfill.
https://opensource.org/osd https://opensource.org/osd