I think there is a fundamental flaw in the whole discussion. We are doing alternative energy for two reasons: 1. As a means for alternative cheap energy; 2. As

I think there is a fundamental flaw in the whole discussion. We are doing alternative energy for two reasons: 1. As a means for alternative cheap energy; 2. As a means to gain independence from imported energy (oil, coal); 3. As a means to protect the environment If a solar farm has to be switched off, because the power can not be sold, apparently 1.) has dominance over 2 and 3. If environment protection would have precedence, consumers should be forced to consume higher priced energy?