3 ms·
Do you think Sokal-type pranks are legitimately exposing pretend science? It seems to me, the strongest conclusion you can make is that some journals are over-e
by n4r9 7y ago
Do you think Sokal-type pranks are legitimately exposing pretend science? It seems to me, the strongest conclusion you can make is that some journals are over-eager to publish studies with edgy titles or themes. This might bring into question the average level of scholarship in a field but it doesn't directly challenge whether a field is legitimate.
Moreover I don't think a journal with a title like "Gender, Place, and Culture" would classify itself as scientific. Its website certainly doesn't do so [0]. You can't expose pretend science if there's no pretension of science.
[0] https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=cgpc20#.VeTSWpjDWRY https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=a...
- Pinegulf 7y agoNo. It's not to expose pretend science, but pretend science publications/magazines. I believe (No, I don't have evidence) that fields of 'X - studies' have people performing research with rigorous practices. Yet, those holding to standards are marred by nonsense publications from people who disregard standards. Edit: This is enabled by magazines printing without... you know, Review.