5 ms·
A fingerprint is only going to stop a very opportunistic attacker. Someone who already has your desktop and app password and physical access to your desktop can
by steve19 7y ago
A fingerprint is only going to stop a very opportunistic attacker. Someone who already has your desktop and app password and physical access to your desktop can probably get a fingerprint off a glass, cup or something else.
I don't think this product is as useful as it seems at first glance. Using stronger passwords is probably just as safe.
But I am no tptacek so I may be completely wrong :)
- onion2k 7y agoA fingerprint is only going to stop a very opportunistic attacker. Someone who already has your desktop and app password and physical access to your desktop can probably get a fingerprint off a glass, cup or something else. The people most of us work with have physical access to our computers and they could probably shoulder surf a short password (use a password manager!). I don't imagine any of them could successfully lift a fingerprint sufficiently well to fool a biometric reader. It's looks easy in perfect conditions on YouTube but in the real world it's a bit harder. I hope not anyway because my office has fingerprint access.
- blablabla123 7y agoDepends how you define an opportunistic hacker. https://xkcd.com/538/ https://xkcd.com/538/
- misterdoubt 7y agoThe tremendous majority of property crime, especially cyber, is opportunistic.
- jeremyjh 7y agoFor most people, their threat model is someone in their home, office or circle of acquaintances snooping on their computer - either casually or with criminal intent but little savvy. These are not sophisticated actors, they are not lifting fingerprints off glasses. Anyway, Yubikey is only a second factor - not your entire security strategy - and I think it is made a bit stronger with a biometric, thats all.
- ekianjo 7y ago> A fingerprint is only going to stop a very opportunistic attacker. Someone who already has your desktop and app password and physical access to your desktop can probably get a fingerprint off a glass, cup or something else. I do hope you realize this raises the amount of work the attacker has to do to actually get access to your device. It's a little like saying a second lock on your door is not going to stop anyone, but in practice statistics are clear: adding one more layer, even if that layer can be defeated as well, reduces the chance of a successful attack, or deters the attacker in the first place.