2 ms·

>Surely "not slowing down" and "not dying" are not on the same scale of importance, don't you think? Surely if the pedestrian does not walk at inappropriate pl

• romwell 7y ago
  >Surely if the pedestrian does not walk at inappropriate place, less likely they would be dying. Who gets to define what is an "inappropriate place"? Pretty much anywhere in the word crossing the road like that woman did would be "appropriate". You just want to define traffic laws to your maximum convenience, all else be damned. Clearly, you see nothing wrong with that: bringing harm to people if you can get away with that. Something tells me you won't think it's fair if someone else gets to decide rules in a way that benefits them at your expense.
  • matz1 7y ago
    >Who gets to define what is an "inappropriate place"? Whoever has the power in charge. >Pretty much anywhere in the word crossing the road like that woman did would be "appropriate". Then it should not be, I don't have to necessarily agree with whatever other country did. >Something tells me you won't think it's fair if someone else gets to decide rules in a way that benefits them at your expense Life is not fair. I will either fight the rules, try to change the rule or find a way to adapt the rules to benefit me. Which is the same as what you are trying to do, trying to change the rules to fit your preference.