3 ms·
>Vigilante is the wrong term on so many levels for her work Agreed, her work is independent peer review, an important part of science and the fundamental way s
by grawprog 7y ago
>Vigilante is the wrong term on so many levels for her work
Agreed, her work is independent peer review, an important part of science and the fundamental way science should work. The entire body of science should be constantly trying to disprove facts and remove falsehoods. Journals shouldn't have a monopoly on this. A rigorous peer review is a rigorous peer review whatever the source.
- marcus_holmes 7y agoThen we need to incentivise peer review, pay people to do it full-time, penalise journals that don't retract, etc. Currently it's not being treated as an important part of science, and that's hurting our progress.