4 ms·
It's lower. You're safer having unprotected sex with someone who is confirmed to have HIV but is taking PrEP, than you are when having unprotected sex with some
by digitallogic 7y ago
It's lower. You're safer having unprotected sex with someone who is confirmed to have HIV but is taking PrEP, than you are when having unprotected sex with someone whose status is unknown.
- woofyman 7y ago> You're safer having unprotected sex with someone who is confirmed to have HIV but is taking PrEP, than you are when having unprotected sex with someone whose status is unknown. PrEP is for hiv negative people. If you’re virus level is undetectable from treatment, then you’re not contagious.
- foldr 7y ago>PrEP is for hiv negative people. It's a rather academic distinction given that it's the same drugs in either case. Definitionally, it's PrEP only if those drugs are being taken as a preventative measure.
- jt0 7y agoThis is an actual distinction. At present PrEP only means Truvada. Truvada is not effective alone for treating HIV. It would be taken in combination with another drug. Also, There's a newer alternative to Truvada that is preferred/less toxic for HIV treatment, but is not yet approved for PrEP. To be clear there are many more drugs used for HIV treatment that are not used for PrEP.
- ingenium 7y agoDescovy was approved for PrEP about 2 month ago. At least in the US.
- digitallogic 7y agoCorrect! Wife works in the field (source for my anecdote), and she confirmed I was confusing PrEP with antiviral treatment.