4 ms·

You mean the latter not the former.

• pvg 7y ago
  No, I mean what I wrote. I don’t have to agree with it but there are plenty of people who think cooperation, however indirect, with a US foreign policy goal is bad. It’s a viewpoint. Calling a thing something that it isn’t is not a viewpoint, it’s just wrong.
  • jolmg 7y ago
    I think perhaps you misunderstood me? You're saying: > I don't have any [difficulty] seeing how someone could view [postponing scheduled downtime] as nefarious but they aren't the same thing. Didn't you instead mean the following? > I don't have any [difficulty] seeing how someone could view [partnering with the US government in order to overthrow governments] as nefarious but they aren't the same thing. Or maybe you did mean that postponing scheduled downtime looks nefarious to some. It just seemed like a weird thing to say compared to the other option.
    • pvg 7y ago
      maybe you did mean that postponing scheduled downtime looks nefarious to some You got it.