Please. This isn't some hypothetical that I'm suggesting. There are largely uncensored forums, like 4chan. That's actually what you get when you go there rath

Please. This isn't some hypothetical that I'm suggesting. There are largely uncensored forums, like 4chan. That's actually what you get when you go there rather than having something that is heavily moderated but only in ways that you agree with, where you then pretend it isn't moderated. And in fact, I'll fully support you having your own platform which is as uncensored as you want it to be. I wish you the best of luck. What I don't support is you arguing that other people can't have their own platforms which restrict publication on their own platform however they see fit, including ways that you or I might disagree with. People arguing that private parties can't limit the material posted on their own property are absolutely taking a position which is contrary to free speech. The power to exclude is just as important, if not more important, than the power to include. If you'd like to argue that the dominance of a few platforms violates my assumptions and changes the tradeoffs, I'm not sure I'd disagree. But I think we should instead worry about fixing the monopoly problems rather than limiting private parties ability to exclude speech they disagree with on their own properties.