2 ms·
It took over four seconds for the system to decide swerving was not sufficient based on path prediction. The improvements made after this report would have init
by mzs 7y ago
It took over four seconds for the system to decide swerving was not sufficient based on path prediction. The improvements made after this report would have initiated braking seconds earlier.
-5.6s 44mph
Classification: Vehicle - by radar
Path prediction: None;
not on the path of the SUV
- Radar makes the first detection of the
pedestrian and estimates its speed.
...
-1.5s 44mph
Classification: Unknown - by lidar
Path prediction: Static;
partially on the path of the SUV
- Lidar detects an unknown object; since
this is a changed classification, and an
unknown object, it lacks tracking history
and is not assigned a goal. ADS predicts
the object’s path as static.
- Although the detected object is partially in
the SUV’s lane of travel, the ADS
generates a motion plan around the object
(maneuver to the right of the object);
this motion plan remains valid—avoiding
the object—for the next two data points.
-1.2s 43mph
Classification: Bicycle - by lidar
Path prediction: The travel lane
of the SUV;
fully on the path of the SUV
- Lidar detects a bicycle; although this is a
changed classification and without a
tracking history, it was assigned a goal.
ADS predicts the bicycle to be on the path
of the SUV.
- The ADS motion plan—generated 300
msec earlier—for steering around the
bicycle was no longer possible; as such,
this situation becomes hazardous.
- Action suppression begins.
* The vehicle started decelerating due to the approaching intersection, where the pre-planned route includes a right turn at Curry Road. The deceleration plan was generated 3.6 seconds before impact
https://dms.ntsb.gov/public/62500-62999/62978/629713.pdf https://dms.ntsb.gov/public/62500-62999/62978/629713.pdf