4 ms·
I'm guessing those numbers are cumulative across all the databases scanned, not within one.
by tomnipotent 7y ago
I'm guessing those numbers are cumulative across all the databases scanned, not within one.
- samokhvalov 7y agoNo, it was a single real-world database. Just in case if it looks surprisingly that Postgres can deal with such numbers of objects, I suggest checking this out: https://www.pgcon.org/2013/schedule/attachments/283_Billion_Tables_Project-PgCon2013.pdf https://www.pgcon.org/2013/schedule/attachments/283_Billion_...