4 ms·
I know this is going to be down-voted to nonexistence since everyone now-a-days wants to serverless, AWS and what not. personally i've always used either hostin
by thrownaway954 7y ago
I know this is going to be down-voted to nonexistence since everyone now-a-days wants to serverless, AWS and what not. personally i've always used either hosting.com or inmotionhosting.com. yes they are more expensive than AWS and what not, but the thing is, they both have a support staff 24/7/365. I called whenever i need and have someone remote into my server and fix whatever is wrong. furthermore, i can even have the server alert emails routed to not only me, but them as well! so they know about the problem and are on it and i don't have to do a thing.
- timc3 7y agoSounds like a very sensible solution.
- mikece 7y agoI don't see why this would be considered something to downvote. You're essentially hiring an outsourced I/T staff by going with a service like this which is probably something that can be leveraged a very long way and will remain cheaper than bringing on full-time staff or engaging contracted I/T consulting.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- neilobremski 7y agoThis is really what I'd suggest to the OP, not necessarily THESE services but SOME form of out-sourced support. You can add technical redundancy until the cows come home and some bug is still going to stop things, probably with the worst possible timing. Until they've figured out enough AI to solve this issue (which would be expensive anyway, I'm sure) then I suggest adding human redundancy.