Everyone is asking you for citations (good thing) but I have very little doubt you're right. These outrage pieces frequently leave out lots of details, particul

Everyone is asking you for citations (good thing) but I have very little doubt you're right. These outrage pieces frequently leave out lots of details, particularly ones that go against the agenda of the article. I suspect this part "But he made a mistake in calculating the interest owed, resulting in another underpayment of $8.41. A little more than a year later, in February 2014, Rafaeli's rental property was one of 11,000 properties put up for auction by Oakland County. It was sold for $24,500 in August of the same year—far less than what Rafaeli had paid for the property just three years earlier." is glossing over a lot of pertinent details.