4 ms·
> For some definition of "have The regular definition of two parties that have agreed something > Sure, which is why nobody is proposing that. Apart from the
by jamiegreen 7y ago
> For some definition of "have
The regular definition of two parties that have agreed something
> Sure, which is why nobody is proposing that.
Apart from the Labour party and the so called Peoples Vote campaign. But apart from them nobody is I suppose
- diffeomorphism 7y ago> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit Parliament passed the second reading of the new agreement allowing it to move to the committee stage for further scrutiny, but they rejected plans to pass it into law before the 31 October deadline, and forced the government (through the 'Benn Act') to ask for a third Brexit delay. This was followed, on the last day of October, by an act providing for an early general election on 12 December. "Have", kinda but not quite. They are also not proposing that. If you have to misrepresent other groups instead of arguing against what they are actually saying then you are not discussing but just talking to yourself.