4 ms·
We can either have fast technological progress, or we can be completely tied up in bureaucratic red tape, with every potential innovation having to go through e
by reedwolf 7y ago
We can either have fast technological progress, or we can be completely tied up in bureaucratic red tape, with every potential innovation having to go through endless "oversight" committees staffed by non-technical airheads.
I know which I prefer.
- kranner 7y ago> We can either have fast technological progress, or we can be completely tied up in bureaucratic red tape, with every potential innovation having to go through endless "oversight" committees staffed by non-technical airheads. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
- FroshKiller 7y agoThat's a false dilemma.
- whatisthiseven 7y agoThat is a false-dichotomy. We can have something more in the middle, or at least less an extreme as "let cars just drive wherever without any tests and when it kills someone just say o well, that's progress". In this particular case, Uber got a deal with the mayor (Governor? I can't remember) of the city to do testing, and it was clear the government bureaucrat allowed them to do whatever, and then coordinated with the police after Uber killed a pedestrian to fabricate evidence that looked like the woman came out of nowhere. I would say that is really far from "endless oversight" and much more into the "just mow them down one at a time until you get it right" territory.