3 ms·
Nice technical demo but almost 0 practical use case. Money would be best spend on the local version of Code which is still lacking in polish for C# on macOS, es
by tasogare 7y ago
Nice technical demo but almost 0 practical use case. Money would be best spend on the local version of Code which is still lacking in polish for C# on macOS, especially when comparing to the original VS.
Also as expect from MS, they reuse the name of an existing product, Visual Studio Online (which was the online repro and built system, renamed in Azure DevOps) for the new system. Super confusing.
- manigandham 7y agoCloud-powered dev environments have many uses, and you can connect to it from your local VSC or VS as well. The teams working on this are completely separate from VSC and there's no progress taken away from that product. C# on macos using visual studio code is powered by the same OmniSharp extension so you should already have the same experience across platforms. VS Code is not aiming for perfect parity with Visual Studio though, and likely never will. There is a separate Visual Studio for Mac product though.
- tasogare 7y agoVisual Studio for Mac (formerly MonoDevelop) is even worse in this respect. I use it for a Xamarin.Android project on my mac but I prefer 10x more the Windows VS. It's better to have these tools than nothing (like 10 years ago) but the "Visual Studio" brand create expectations in quality. And both Code and for Mac are no there yet.