3 ms·
There is value in having the means to generate power independent of environmental factors (sun, wind). A stated goal in the article is also to build small-scale
by lorenzhs 7y ago
There is value in having the means to generate power independent of environmental factors (sun, wind). A stated goal in the article is also to build small-scale fusion reactors, which would reduce transmission costs. Wind power and non-residential solar power also need similar transmission equipment because you can't have them in the middle of a city. The price of renewable power generation is reaching extremely favourable levels even now, but I'm not sure how realistic it is to expect transmission costs to decrease as far as you seem to expect.
I'm not convinced we'll see a significant amount of fusion power in electricity grids, but for specialised applications, it would make a lot of sense (e.g., powering ships, or a hypothetical Mars colony that would like to keep the lights on during a dust storm). Building such limited numbers will, of course, do nothing to get the price of fusion power down. Maybe subsidies will be able to overcome the cost dilemma posed by this, but there's no clear motivation for providing them if the power sources replaced by fusion would already be majority-renewable.
- jacknews 7y ago"A stated goal in the article is also to build small-scale fusion reactors, which would reduce transmission costs." aka enable them to be installed on submarines and so on.
- pfdietz 7y agoThe power density of even these putative "small" reactors would still be grossly inferior to fission reactors. So using them in space limited applications like subs would make no sense at all.
- catalogia 7y agoAnd even if the reactors were small enough, there is no guarantee they'd be quiet enough.