I do a variant of this, login+company@domain.com (or more often login-company@domain.com as + is often rejected at html forms). In my experience, catch-all ema

I do a variant of this, login+company@domain.com (or more often login-company@domain.com as + is often rejected at html forms). In my experience, catch-all email (*@domain.com) increased number of spam as spambots send out emails to randomly generated adresses (john@domain.com, stephen@domain.com, anne@domain.com).