2 ms·
This is a common stereotyping to assume. The quality of work you get from outsourcing is directly proportional to the amount you spend. If you need talented pe
by gowthamgts12 7y ago
This is a common stereotyping to assume. The quality of work you get from outsourcing is directly proportional to the amount you spend.
If you need talented people you have to spend more money. It's as simple as that.
- wheelerwj 7y ago> you have to spend more money. i'd go even more broad: its not just about money, its also about time. You can get good returns on junior team members but you need to put in the time to coach/teach/guide/manage just like anything else. more money just means that you're paying someone else to put in the time. Which is cool, different models work in different scenarios.
- pferde 7y agoThat doesn't work when you outsource to Infosys or Cognizant - the people you just spent two weeks coaching and training will be gone next week, replaced by brand new blank-slated, interchangeable cogs. These large Indian outsourcing companies are nothing but a big scam that has cost us millions in productivity, not to mention stress and frustration for not being able to get things done.
- wheelerwj 7y agoI haven't worked directly with those specific firms so I can't comment directly. But that seems like a contractual issue.
- t0ddbonzalez 7y agoQED. Once you're forced to spend more than x amount to secure talented workers, surely you might as well employ domestic programmers/DBAs/whatever?