4 ms·
40 GB/s in L1 cache. The TurboBase64 benchmark is more practical. It is impossible to have the speed of a good memcpy when you're copying 33% more like in base
by powturbo 7y ago
40 GB/s in L1 cache. The TurboBase64 benchmark is more practical.
It is impossible to have the speed of a good memcpy when you're copying 33% more like in base64.
- bluesign 7y agoI think 40GB/s result when it is not fitting L1 cache. If you check result graph, On L1 cache fitting data memcpy is ahead with big difference, then they are almost head to head
- powturbo 7y agoL1 cache is 64k for this cpu. A benchmark with large files is more realistic, because it's unlikely that the data already be in the L1 cache.