Let's not call this "peer-review" as if it were some sort of scientific process. What you're talking about is a social acceptability test. Now, that's fine, s

Let's not call this "peer-review" as if it were some sort of scientific process. What you're talking about is a social acceptability test. Now, that's fine, so far as it goes. Every society needs mores and norms to govern behavior (and speech) in order to function. But let's not suppose that suppressing an individual's freedom to express thoughts not pre-approved is going to result in a net win for truth.