4 ms·

OTOH ranges usually get compiled to faster and more efficient code. Smaller too.

• jcelerier 7y ago
  > OTOH ranges usually get compiled to faster and more efficient code. Smaller too. than raw loops ? do you have an example ?
  • mangix 7y ago
    Not particularly. However I do develop on OpenWrt where size is important. On some C++ projects, when I convert the for loops to range based ones using clang-tidy's modernize-loop-convert, I usually get a reduction in compiled size (compiling with -Os of course).
    • in3d 7y ago
      If think the parent was talking more about C++20 ranges based on the range-v3 library, not about the for loop ranges.
      • jcelerier 7y ago
        that is indeed the case.