4 ms·
> it's risky because you've passed all the risk to the end user and their opsec. This was exactly my point. With pervasive crypto end users can assume this to
by rusk 7y ago
> it's risky because you've passed all the risk to the end user and their opsec.
This was exactly my point. With pervasive crypto end users can assume this to a greater degree, whether you believe that appropriate or not.
Visa e.g. requires specialist terminal equipment, complicated issuer and acquirer and banking relationships and is heavily dependent on legal enforcement wherever you use it. Try using mastercard or visa in a third world country.
For “actual” money transfer, compare with western union where toure talking about ~10% fee.
> ... nothing that’s actually true
Oh you’re a rude one. But I’m sure to somebody you’re very special. Good boy.
- Nursie 7y ago>This was exactly my point. It's not a point you made before this, you just said it was "more secure" and "cheaper" without qualification. Now you're just trotting out 'coiner memes about the third world and Western Union. (You can use Visa in 200 countries by the way) Have a nice evening, I'm done here.