2 ms·
But regulations did force companies to accept credit ratings from and use rating agencies that, under other regulations, had explicit immunity from liability fo
by jandrewrogers 7y ago
But regulations did force companies to accept credit ratings from and use rating agencies that, under other regulations, had explicit immunity from liability for bad faith ratings. Even if companies knew the credit ratings were fraudulent, they were required to use them per regulation.
The regulatory framework for credit ratings created a serious moral hazard out of whole cloth, and then actively shielded bad actors from scrutiny. It was a clear and obvious case of regulatory malfeasance, and while the subprime mortgage issue was a manifest consequence of that malfeasance, they did not cause it.
The government allowed this regulatory capture by credit agencies to occur because it directly benefitted the government as well, as they are required to rely on these same credit agencies for their own debt instruments.
- downvoted 7y agoSo, the government benefited from the creation of the housing bubble in its own debt instruments, the same debt instruments that would go into the hands of the people who were being swindled by the banks that were the original cause of the bubble.