3 ms·
You interpreted "employees of a company to use their corporate position to push what are private political goals" as "companies not push[ing] for political goal
by viridian 7y ago
You interpreted "employees of a company to use their corporate position to push what are private political goals" as "companies not push[ing] for political goals" in order to sarcastically respond.
There is a difference between a company and it's individual employees, and rephrasing the statement such that "employees of a company" is replaced with "a company" in order to mock a user is rude and also not substantive.
- magicalist 7y ago> There is a difference between a company and it's individual employees, and rephrasing the statement such that "employees of a company" is replaced with "a company" Unless there's a good argument that managers and executives are somehow different than other employees, companies pushing for political goals absolutely are employees of a company using their position to push private political goals.
- cbnotfromthere 7y agoUnless there's a good argument that managers and executives are somehow different than other employees By definition managers/executives are different than (other) employees. That's why managers / executives can't unionize. That's why managers / executives represent the company, while the (other) employees just work there. Clear now?