Here's the chapter and section that would be amended: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section53 https://malegislature.gov/L

Here's the chapter and section that would be amended: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section53 https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Cha... The first 2 subsections are broad and vague, relying on (I presume) some "reasonable person" standard to evaluate them. This proposed section seems oddly specific. It only seeks to add "bitch" as a specific violation of (a) or (b). Not sure why "whore", "cunt", or other vulgarities aren't also enumerated. Also, I gotta be missing some backstory here. Did Daniel J. Hunt get his feelings hurt one day outside the capital building? EDIT: I was missing something. See sibling comment on Massachusetts' Right to Free Petition. My apologies to Mr. Hunt for assuming he was the impetus for this.